Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Download Solution

Related Solution

Week 3 - Journal_167...
I learned many things that consisted of relevant information. Some items were checked, but I knew substantial data played a role in my comprehension of the concepts with every new thing I knew. Any of...

Week 3 Journal
Week 3 Journal

I learned many things that consisted of relevant i

Week 6 Lab_165579125...
Answer: 9,000 of them were signed with MD5 Answer: a cluster of 200 PlayStation 3’s, Total cost of certificate was $657 Answer: This would allow someone with malicious intent to conduct a “man-in-the-...

Week 6 Lab
Week 6 Lab

Answer: 9,000 of them were signed with MD5 Answer:

Week 8 Discussion_16...
The United States vs Alvarez case was one where the Supreme Court ruled out the Stolen Valor Act and deemed it unconstitutional. This is because the First Amendment which gives everyone the right to s...

Week 8 Discussion
Week 8 Discussion

The United States vs Alvarez case was one where th

Week 14 Assignment_ Negotiation

Week 14 Assignment_ Negotiation

Q 1. What caused the first sign of a roadblock or impasse in the jury room?2. Identify an example where jurors demonstrated defend-attack behavior.3. Identify an example where a juror gave in to another juror.4. Identify an example where a juror broke off the negotiation.5. What did juror no. 8 (Henry Fonda) do to illustrate self-control by not reacting to opposition, and "going to the balcony"? Explain fully.6. How did juror no. 8 (Henry Fonda) "step to another juror's side" to see his perspective? Explain fully.7. How did juror no. 8 (Henry Fonda) avoid rejecting other jurors' positional statements about the defendant's innocence or guilt and "reframe" the issue in a way that suggested they should keep working? Explain fully.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

View Complete Solution
The sign of a roadblock or impasse arose when Juror 8 voted “not guilty” as he states that the accused must be given some deliberation. He does not follow the crowd and gives his own decision. His action caused roadblock because all other voted guilty for the boy. The interesting part is that every member of the jury comes from a different background and that leads to the different opinions. Pre-conceived notions and being unprofessional also create certain roadblocks in taking proper decisions. This difference of opinion cause certain visible roadblocks or impasse in the jury room. Juror 8 here wants a proper discussion before going to a verdict. This shows clarity in communication.